Getting Research Published: An A-Z of Publication Strategy

Preț: 180^,00 lei

Disponibilitate: la comandă (vezi secțiunea "Despre livrare")

adaugă în coș

Autor: Elizabeth Wager

ISBN: 9781785231384

Editura: CRC Press

Anul publicării: 2016

Ediția: 3

Pagini: 204

DESCRIERE

The third edition of this popular and highly-regarded guide uncovers the ethics, conventions and often unwritten rules of publishing in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. It provides clear direction on how to choose the right journal, avoid publication delays, resolve authorship disputes and many other problems associated with being published that pose challenges to new and experienced researchers alike.

The A to Z format is highly accessible to readers with different backgrounds and varying levels of publication experience, including students and healthcare professionals, medical researchers and individuals working in drug companies and communications agencies. It will be particularly valuable to anyone involved in planning publications.

PUBLICATION STRATEGY – AN OVERVIEW

Step-by-Step Guide to Publication Strategy

Developing a Publication Plan for a Multicentre Study

How Long Will it Take?

Working with a Medical Writer

Dr. Seymour and the Disappearing Paper: A Cautionary Tale

A TO Z OF PUBLICATION STRATEGY

Abstracts

Acceptance rates

Acceptance times

Access to data

Accountability of authors

Acknowledgements

Advertising departments

Affiliations

American Medical Writers Association (AMWA)

Anonymous reviewers

Appeals

Approval

Article formats

Article processing charge (APC)

Artwork

Authors’ affiliations

Authorship

Back-up plan

Beall’s list

Bias

Bibliographic software

‘Big Five’

BioMed Central

Blinded (masked) review

Blogs

Board of Editors in the Life Sciences (BELS)

Books

Brief

By-line (or masthead)

Certified Medical Publication Professional (CMPP)

Checklists

ClinicalTrials. gov

Cloned journals

Co-authors

Collaborators

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

Competing interest

Conditional acceptance

Conflict of interest / competing interest

Congress / conference choice

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)

CONSORT

CONSORT for Abstracts

Contact details

Contracts

Contributorship (vs. authorship)

COPE

Copy editing

Corporate integrity agreement (CIA)

Corrections (errata)

Corresponding author

Council of Science Editors (CSE)

Cover letter / covering letter

Creative Commons (CC) licences

CrossCheck

CrossMark

Data access

Data analysis plan

Data dredging

Data ownership

DataVision

Deadlines

Decision times

DeepDyve

Diamond Open Access

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) system

Duplicate publication

Economic (health outcomes) evaluations

Editorial board

Editorials

Editors

Electronic publishing

Electronic review

Electronic submission

ELPS

Embargoes

Encore abstracts

Enhanced publications

Envision

e- Prints

epub

EQUATOR Network

Errata

European Association of Science Editors (EASE)

European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT)

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA)

European Medical Writers Association (EMWA)

Expectations

Expedited review

External review

F1000Research

Fast-track publication

FDAAA

Fees

Figure legends

Figures

First author

Footnotes

Formatting requirements

Freebies / ‘throwaways’

Galley proofs

Gap analysis

Ghost authors

Ghost writers

Gift authorship

Gold Open Access

Good Publication Practice (GPP, GPP2 and GPP3)

Graphs

Green Open Access

Group authorship

Guarantor

Guest authors / gift authorship

Hanging Committee

Hijacked journals

Hot topics

House style

Hybrid journals

Image manipulation

Impact factors

IMRAD structure

Indexing

Informal review

Ingelfinger rule

In-house review

Initials

In press

Institutional repositories

Instructions to authors (contributors)

Internal review

International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)

International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP)

Investigators’ agreements

ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number)

Journal cascades and consortia

Journal choice

Journalists

JULIET

Key message(s)

Key people / players

Key words

Last author

Late breaker abstracts

Lead time

Legends

Letters to the editor

Masked review

Meat extenders

Media relations

Medical writers

Medline

Meeting choice

Meetings (of the writing group)

Mega-journal

MeSH headings

Metrics

Names

Negative studies

Nitpickers

Number of authors

Number of publications

Offprints

Ombudsman / ombudsperson

Open Access journals

Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)

OpenDOAR (the Directory of Open Access Repositories)

Open peer review

Oral presentations

ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)

Order of authors

Organisations

Outlines

Overlapping publications

Ownership of data

Page budget

Page charges

PeerJ

Peers

Permissions

Personal communications

Personal websites

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)

Physician Payments Sunshine Act

Pico / PICO

Placeholder abstracts

Plagiarism

Planning

Platinum Open Access

Pooled data

PLOS

Poster presentations

Post-publication comments

Post-publication peer review

Predatory journals

Predatory publishers

Preprints

Press conferences

Press releases

Pre- submission enquiries

Primary publication

Prior publication

PRISMA

Promoting your work

Proofs (page proofs)

Protocol review

Publication agreements

Publication bias

Publication Plan

Publication policy

Publication steering committee

Publication strategy

Public Library of Science (PLOS)

PubMed

PubMed Central

PubStrat

Queries

Queues

Readership

Redundant publication

References

Reformatting

Rejection

Reporting guidelines

Reprints

Retractions

Reviewer choice

Reviewers’ comments

Review process

Role of sponsor

RoMEO

Running title

Salami science / slicing

Secondary publications

Second target journal

Selective publication

Self- archiving

SHERPA/FACT

SHERPA/JULIET

SHERPA/RoMEO

Short reports

Short title

Slides

Social media

Sponsor, role of

Strategy

STROBE

Style

Sub-editing

Submission fees

Submission letter

Subscription journals

Sunshine Act

Supplementary material

Supplements

Tables

Target audience

Target journal

Technical editing

Text recycling

The Publication Plan

‘Throwaways’

Timing

Title

Title page

Translations

Trial identifier

Trial registration

Editors (ICMJE)

Unpublished data (references to)

Vancouver Group

Verbal branding

Veto

Vicious reviewers

Waivers

WAME

Web publication / institutional websites

Withdrawal

World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)

World Medical Association (WMA)

Writing

Writing group

Xenophobia (geographical bias)

Young reviewers

Zealots and assassins

Appendix 1 Further reading

Appendix 2 Organisations

Appendix 3 Guidelines

Appendix 4 Principles of good publication practice for company sponsored medical research (from GPP3)

Dr. Elizabeth Wager has been a freelance publications consultant and trainer since 2001 and has worked with scientists, editors and writers on six continents. Before setting up her own company she worked in the publishing and pharmaceutical industries. She is an author of Good Publication Practice for Company-Sponsored Research (GPP3), a Fellow of the UK EQUATOR Centre, Visiting Professor at the University of Split Medical School in Croatia, a member of the Ethics Committees of The BMJ and the World Association of Medical Editors, the former Chair of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and Co-Editor-in-Chief of Research Integrity & Peer Review.